ETH 321T Week 3 Practice Assignment
ETH 321T Week 3 Practice Assignment
PLDZ-13567
Free
In Stock
Free Download!
Description
***************************************************************
Click Here To Download Your Files :
https://uopcourse.com/category/eth-321/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can buy more tutorials from the below link
https://uopcourse.com/
***************************************************************
ETH 321T Week 3 Practice Assignment
Complete the Week 3 Practice Assignment in MyEducator.
ETH 321 Week 3 Practice Assignment
- Lexi buys a food processor and uses it without any problems. She loans the processor to Jill, and Jill is injured when a part flies off the machine. If the former rule of privity of contract were in place, which of the following is true?
- Lexi can hold the manufacturer liable for Jill’s injury.
- Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury.
- Jill can hold the manufacturer liable for her injury as long as Lexi was in the room when she got hurt.
- Jill cannot hold the manufacturer responsible for her injury.
- For years, Lily has been thinking up a plan to pull off a perfect bank robbery. She tells someone about her plans but never robs the bank. Which of the following is true?
- Lily has committed a crime because robbing a bank is a serious offense.
- Lily has committed a crime because she told someone about her plan.
- Lily has not committed a crime if it is determined that her intent is not real.
- Lily has not committed a crime because she never acted on her plan.
- What is the definition of the business crime of fraud?
- Permanent taking of property against a fiduciary relationship
- Conducting transactions with money which has been obtained through illegal means
- Agreement and planning to commit another crime
- Use of false pretenses to obtain property
- What is the definition of insanity as a defense to crime?
- The defendant lacks understanding of what is right or wrong
- Trauma, illness, or a mental condition inhibits the defendant from being able to commit a crime
- The defendant's crime was committed due to unintentional misunderstanding
- The defendant is impaired from an ability to commit a crime with intent
- Which of the following is true of defamation?
- The defamatory information may or may not be true to be actionable.
- A defamation tort exists whether the defamatory information was spread accidentally or on purpose.
- A defamation tort only exists when ten or more people hear the defamatory information.
- Both B and C
- Rank these types of crimes from most to least serious:
- Capital, misdemeanor, felony, infraction
- Infraction, felony, misdemeanor, capital
- Capital, felony, misdemeanor, infraction
- Felony, infraction, capital, misdemeanor
- Which of the following classifies as a tort?
- Kidnapping
- Embezzlement
- Assault
- Burglary
- Which of the following would least likely qualify as trespass to chattel?
- Having your neighbor’s cat spayed while your neighbor is on vacation
- Dying your boss’s suit pink as a prank
- Borrowing your dad’s car to get it waxed
- Conducting a cyberattack to infect a victim’s computer with spyware
- Which of the following is not a case of negligence?
- A butcher plays audio of howling dogs in the back of his shop to prank customers
- A doctor prescribes the wrong pills to a patient
- A building manager fails to repair an elevator and people get stuck inside
- A driver falls asleep at the wheel and causes an accident
- What is the definition of the business crime of larceny?
- Taking property under threat of force
- Permanent taking of property against a fiduciary relationship
- Unlawful entrance with intent to commit a crime
- Unlawful, permanent taking of personal property
***************************************************************
Click Here To Download Your Files :
https://uopcourse.com/category/eth-321/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can buy more tutorials from the below link
https:/