PHL 320T Wk 5 Discussion - Clarifying a Statement
PHL 320T Wk 5 Discussion - Clarifying a Statement
PLDZ-13253
In Stock
Buy and Download >
Description
***************************************************************
Click Here To Download Your Files :
https://uopcourse.com/category/phl-320t-all-discussions/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can buy more tutorials from the below link
https://uopcourse.com/
***************************************************************
PHL 320T Wk 5 Discussion – Clarifying a Statement
Discussion Topic
Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.
Due Thursday
Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:
In the textbook, “Vehicles are prohibited on the paths in the park” is used as an example of a law that might require clarification. Decide?whether the law should be interpreted to forbid motorcycles, bicycles, children’s pedal cars, and battery-powered remote-control cars. On what grounds are you deciding each of these cases?
Due Monday
Reply to at least two of your classmates. Be constructive and professional in your responses.
***************************************************************
Click Here To Download Your Files :
https://uopcourse.com/category/phl-320t-all-discussions/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You can buy more tutorials from the be