PHL 320T All Discussions | eBooks | Education

PHL 320T All Discussions

PHL 320T All Discussions PLDZ-13248
In Stock
$ 12.00 USD
Buy and Download   > Description

***************************************************************

Click Here To Download Your Files :  

https://uopcourse.com/category/phl-320t-all-discussions/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

You can buy more tutorials from the below link

https://uopcourse.com/

***************************************************************

PHL 320T All Discussions

The Latest Version A+ Study Guide

 

**********************************************

PHL 320T All Discussions Link

https://uopcourse.com/category/phl-320t-all-discussions/

**********************************************

 

 

PHL 320T Wk 1 Discussion – Cognitive Bias

 

 

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.

Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Which of the cognitive biases discussed in this section do you think you might be most subject to?

 

 

 

    • What might you do to compensate for this bias factor?

 

 

 

Due Monday

Reply to at least two of your classmates. Be constructive and professional in your responses.

 

 

 

PHL 320T Wk 2 Discussion – Dishonesty as a Character Issue

 

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.

Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Expertise doesn’t transfer automatically from one field to another: Being an expert in one area does not automatically qualify a person as an expert (or even as competent) in other areas. Is it the same with dishonesty? Many people think dishonesty does transfer, that being dishonest in one area automatically discredits that person in all areas. For example, when Bill Clinton lied about having sexual encounters with his intern, some said he couldn’t be trusted about anything.

Respond?to the following:

 

PHL 320T Wk 3 Discussion – Experiment Design

 

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.

Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

Suppose a university teacher wants to know whether or not requiring attendance improves student learning. How could she find out? Describe?an experiment that an instructor might actually use. Review?the experiments posted by your classmates. Evaluate?the pros and cons of their proposals, and when applicable, suggest improvements or ask follow-up questions.

Due Monday

Reply to at least two of your classmates. Be constructive and professional in your responses.

 

 

 

 

PHL 320T Wk 4 Discussion – Rhetorical Fallacies

 

 

Discussion Topic

 

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.

Due Thursday

Respond to the following in a minimum of 175 words:

 

PHL 320T Wk 5 Discussion – Clarifying a Statement

 

 

Discussion Topic

 

Post a total of 3 substantive responses over 2 separate days for full participation. This includes your initial post and 2 replies to other students.

Due Thursday

*************************************************************** Click Here To Download Your Files : https://uopcourse.com/category/phl-320t-all-discussions/ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You can buy more tutorials from the be
Recent Reviews Write a Review
0 0 0 0 reviews