MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1 | Documents and Forms | Research Papers

MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1

MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1 PLDZ-202
In Stock
$ 10.00 USD
Buy and Download   > Description

MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1

Complete the Peer Review. Grades will be prorated based on the evaluation. You are required to submit this assignment to Lopeswrite.

Resource: Peer Evaluation

Complete this peer evaluation for each member of your team, including yourself. The average score from these evaluations will be used in determining your final grade for the assignment.

Rate each team member on a scale of 1 to 100, with 100 being the highest. Use the rubric on the second page to determine the score for each team member. Include comments explaining why you gave your teammate this score.

Your peer evaluations will be kept strictly confidential. Your grade for the evaluation will be posted in the gradebook as an assignment, but individual ratings will not be shared. 

Group member:

List names

Rating:

1 -100

Comments:

Must be completed for each team member

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

 

5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CATEGORY  

100-93 pts (A) Excellent

92-83 pts (B) Good

82-73 pts (C) Improving

 

72-0 pts (D) Needs Improvement

 

Contributions

Routinely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. Contributes a lot of effort.

Usually provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. A good group member who tries   hard.

Sometimes provides useful ideas when participating in the

group discussion. A satisfactory group member who does what is required.

Rarely provides useful ideas when participating in the group discussion. May refuse to participate.

Quality of Work

No correction or revision necessary,

Work   work is complete and of high

 

Revisions and corrections may not be necessary and work is adequate for what is needed.

 

Some revision and/or correction is needed or work is not always completed in the manner required.

 

Work provided constantly needs correction and revision and is often incomplete.

 

Time Management

All work is turned in on time or even earlier than necessary, the team member is reliable for posting/submitting whole pieces that the group has put together and responsibilities never need to be reassigned to compensate.

Work is, for the most part, on time and, on a few occasions, early. For the most part, the team member is reliable for submitting completed team documents. Group member does not need to be compensated for.

 

Occasionally the work is on time. Rarely is it early. On one or two occasions did the rest of the group need to compensate for missing or late work.

 

Occasionally the work is on time and is never early. Team member cannot be relied on to turn in team documents and other members sometimes must compensate for tardiness of work assigned.

 

Attitude

Always has a positive attitude about the project and works well with the other team members. Any criticism given is constructive.

 

Usually has a positive attitude toward the work and group, but conflict is usually minor. Any criticism is often constructive.

Attitude is hit or miss toward project and group, but member is for the most part tolerable. Criticism given   is, on occasion, constructive, if given at all.

Rarely has a positive attitude; participation, quality of work, and time management is severely affected by such; and team member has difficulties and conflict with group.

 

After the total for each student has been added together, and divided by the number of team members rating him/her; calculate the following:  /100 x 2% = out of 2 points for this evaluation.

 

MGT 420 Grand Canyon Module 2 Assignment 1 Complete the Peer Review. Grades will be prorated based on the evaluation. You are required to submit this assignment to Lopeswrite. Resource: Peer Evaluation Complete this peer evaluation for each member
Recent Reviews Write a Review
0 0 0 0 reviews