Theoretical Frameworks - Select and carefully read 1of the following articles. Each covers a different | eBooks | Education

Theoretical Frameworks - Select and carefully read 1of the following articles. Each covers a different

Theoretical Frameworks - Select and carefully read 1of the following articles. Each covers a different PLDZ-2707
In Stock
$ 6.00 USD
Buy and Download   > Description

Primary Task Response:Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.

Theoretical Frameworks

Select and carefully read 1of the following articles. Each covers a different theoretical topic. For more information, use the online library to search for the articles.

The article is available online using theLIBRARYor theDoctoral Library.

Consider how 1 of these theoretical topics could have applicability for your own research problem or issue.

  • Disaster Management:Lettieri, E., Masella, C., & Radaelli, G. (2009). Disaster management: Findings from a systematic review.Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(2), 117–136. doi: 10.1108/09653560910953207. ABI/INFORM Complete
  • Adult Learning:Roessger, K. M. (2012). Toward an interdisciplinary perspective: A review of adult learning frameworks and theoretical models of motor learning.Adult Education Quarterly, 62(4), 371–392. doi: 10.1177/0741713612436598. Academic Search Premier
  • Commitment:Sleesman, D. J., Conlon, D. E., McNamara, G., & Miles, J. E. (2012). Cleaning up the big muddy: A meta-analytic review of the determinants of escalation of commitment.Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 541–562. Business Source Complete
  • Diversity:Stahl, G. K., Maznevski, M. L., Voigt, A., & Jonsen, K. (2010). Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A meta-analysis of research on multicultural work groupsJournal of International Business Studies,4(41), 690–709. ABI/INFORMComplete
  • Manager Integrity:Davis, A. L., & Rothstein, H. R. (2006). The effects of the perceived behavioral integrity of managers on employee attitudes: A meta-analysis.Journal of Business Ethics,67, 407–419. Business Source Complete
  • Power and Influence:Elias, S. (2008). Fifty years of influence in the workplace: The evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy.Journal of Management History, 14(3), 267–283. Doctoral Library-Emerald
  • Virtual Teams:Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. SAGE Journals (do not include the question mark when searching for this title in Sage)
  • Information Systems:Weigel, F. K., Hazen, B. T., Cegielski, C. G., & Hall, D. J. (2014). Diffusion of innovations and the theory of planned behavior in information systems research: A metaanalysis.Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 34, 619–636. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3754&context=cais
  • Interpersonal Trust:Lewicki, R. J., Tomlinson, E. C., & Gillespie, N. (2006). Models of interpersonal trust development: Theoretical approaches, empirical evidence, and future directions.Journal of Management, 32(6), 991–1022.SAGE Journals
  • Market Orientation/Market “Driving”:Hills, S., & Sarin, S. (2003). From market driven to market driving: An alternate paradigm for marketing in high technology industries.Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 11(3), 13–24. Business Source Complete
  • Network:Nah, S. (2014). A theoretical and analytical framework toward networked communities. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 17(1), 23-36. doi: 10.1080/13183222.2010.11009024.
  • Organizational Change:Armenakis, A. A., & Harris, S. G. (2009). Reflections: Our journey in organizational change research and practice.Journal of Change Management, 9(2), 127–142. Business Source Complete
  • Organizational Consciousness:Pees, R. C., & Shoop, G. H. (2009). Organizational consciousness.Journal of Health Organization and Management, 23(5), 505–521. Emerald Management
  • Organizational Culture:Büschgens, T., Bausch, A., & Balkin, D. B. (2013). Organizational culture and innovation: A meta-analytic review.Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 763–781. doi: 10.1111/jpim.12021. Business Source Complete
  • Organizational Justice/Fairness:Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research.Journal of Applied Psychology, 86,425–445. Business Source Complete
  • Organizational Knowledge Leadership:Lakshman, C. (2007). Organizational knowledge leadership: a grounded theory approach. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 28(1), 51–75. Emerald Management
  • Power and Influence:Elias, S. (2008). Fifty years of influence in the workplace: The evolution of the French and Raven power taxonomy.Journal of Management History, 14(3), 267–283. Emerald Management
  • Project Management:Hanisch, B., & Wald, A. (2011). A project management research framework integrating multiple theoretical perspectives and influencing factors.Project Management Journal, 42(3), 4–22. doi: 10.1002/pmj.20241. Business Source Complete
  • Terror Management: Pyszczynski, T. (2004). What are we so afraid of? A terror management theory perspective on the politics of fear.Social Research, 71(4) 827–848. Biography in Context
  • Virtual Teams:Martins, L. L., Gilson, L. L., & Maynard, M. T. (2004). Virtual teams: What do we know and where do we go from here?Journal of Management, 30(6), 805–835. SAGE Journals (do not include the question mark when searching for this title in Sage)

Focus your discussion on the following:

  • Include a description of the theoretical topic, along with associated definitions relevant to the theoretical/conceptual area.
  • Explain how you could use these theoretical/conceptual ideas or theories to narrow the focus of your selected research problem area.

 

Primary Task Response:Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive a
Recent Reviews Write a Review
0 0 0 0 reviews