Unit VII Research CSU Paper-BBA 3651, Leadership Write a research paper that analyzes methods...
Buy and Download >
Unit VII Research CSU Paper-BBA 3651, LeadershipWrite a research paper that analyzes methods used to appropriately manage groups and teams. In your paper, be sure to include the following:? Discuss the process of evolving a group into a team and the importance of organizational culture in that process.? Evaluate the leadership styles that are effective for managing groups and teams, including unique considerations for leading multicultural teams.? Describe the benefits and drawbacks of having groups or teams in terms of groupthink vs. teamthink.Be sure to follow the guidelines below:? Your introduction should engage the reader and clearly present the thesis and a summary of the main points to clarify your point of view.? Review of literature should present a critical analysis and synthesis of the existing research.? Discussion should reveal insightful analysis of research.? A summary should be present that reviews or summarizes key points and provides a smooth transition between sections.? Writing should be clear and concise with correct use of sentence structure and should be free of grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors.? Your paper should be at least four pages in length.? You must also use at least five outside sources to support assertions and conclusions.? All sources used must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations in APA format In this article significant attention has been devoted to the actual benefits derived from self-managing teams (SMT). One important challenge to SMT success—the threats that groups face when making decisions—is examined. Locate and read the following article: Manz, C. C., & Neck, C. P. (1995). Teamthink: Beyond the groupthink syndrome in self-managing work teams. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 10(1), 7. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/docview/215865256?accountid=3 3337 Please note that the above article appears in two different journals in two different years. Please make sure to locate the article in the journal and year listed in the provided reference. The authors of this article explain the following: (a) describes our perspective on 'received wisdom' and 'groupthink' and how these phenomena affect organizational ethical culture, (b) provides numerous examples of the negative effects of 'unwise' received wisdom and groupthink on poor ethical decisions and actions taken by organizations in recent history, (c) discusses their concept of ethical organizational cultures based on character, and (d) outlines intentional steps organizational leaders can take to see that received wisdom leads to an ethical organizational culture based on character. Locate and read pages 75-87 (pages 1-13 in the PDF) of the following article: Sims, R. R., & Sauser, W. I. (2013). Toward a better understanding of the relationships among received wisdom, groupthink, and organizational ethical culture. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 14(4), 75-90. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/docview/1503089275?accountid= 33337 The purpose of this article was to examine published research on small-group development done in the last 10 years that would constitute an empirical test of Tuckman's (1965) hypothesis that groups go through the stages of "forming," "storming," "norming," and "performing." Locate and read pages 43-48 in the following article: Tuckman, B. W., & Jensen, M. A. (2010). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies (Pre-1986), 2(4), 43-48. Retrieved from https://libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/login?auth=CAS&url=http://search.ebscohost.com/logi n.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=49049910&site=ehost-live&scope=site